五号作坊（E5T9)Wuhao Zuofang (E5T9)

原表行号：148；出土时间：1983；原表总数：11；不明，遗址中发现了不少残缺的刀币石范，铭文“成白”，使用青石磨制而成，残范上有流口。

Original table row No.: 148; Excavation year: 1983; Original total count: 11; Location remark: Uncertain; a number of fragmentary stone knife-coin moulds inscribed "Chengbai" were found at the site, made of polished bluestone, with a pour spout on the surviving mould fragments.

原表行号：154；出土时间：1983；不明，这里群众整地时，除经常发现陶范外，还发现不少残缺的成白刀币石范，用青石磨成。遗址的西南部已多次出土成捆的刀币，数量达数百斤之多，都是发现与钱窖中，共出土刀币四种，以直背成百为主，另有燕国弧背刀币，邯郸和白化较少。陶范和石范共出。P75。

Original table row No.: 154; Excavation year: 1983; Location remark: Uncertain; when local people level fields here, besides pottery moulds, they often find fragmentary Chengbai knife-coin stone moulds, ground from bluestone. The southwest part of the site has repeatedly yielded bundled knife coins totaling several hundred jin, always found within coin pits; four types of knife coins were unearthed in all, mostly straight-back Chengbai coins, with a smaller number of Yan-state curved-back knives, and fewer still of the Handan and Baihua types. Pottery moulds and stone moulds occur together. P. 75.

原表行号：159；原表总数：8；灰坑，房屋东侧清理出冶铜炉一处，浇筑坑，加工石料。西侧长方形坑内埋藏有三个陶瓮，其中庄折六个布币范和两个刀币范。会坑内对着坩埚碎片和使用以后废弃的上述两种铸币范的碎片，数量有几十块之多。铸造炉就是地面下挖的原坑，炉体成圆形。南颁布有一长方形浇注坑。石范不是实用范，刀币型腔过深，布币过浅，只有一个范面，似乎是石工随意雕刻的。遗址中没有一件类似的货币范和货币。P85.

Original table row No.: 159; Original total count: 8; Location remark: Ash pit. East of the house foundation, a bronze-smelting furnace, a casting pit, and a stone-working area were cleared. In a rectangular pit to the west, three pottery weng urns were buried, containing six spade-coin moulds and two knife-coin moulds, folded/stacked together. Within the pit, opposite crucible fragments, were fragments of the two mould types described above, discarded after use, numbering several dozen pieces in all. The casting furnace was simply the original pit dug into the ground, with a circular furnace body; to the south a rectangular pouring pit was distributed. The stone moulds are not practical moulds — the knife-coin cavity is too deep and the spade-coin cavity too shallow, with only one mould face each — they appear to have been carved casually by a stoneworker. No coin resembling these moulds, nor any of these moulds' products, was found at the site. P. 85.